Compare tram vs train | Differences

Compare it Versus > Travel > Compare tram vs train

Lets look at some differences between trams and trains.

[addtoany]

Trams versus Trains:

Trams and trains are both types of railway transportation which run on tracks but the similarity between them ends there since they are inherently totally different from each other.

For trains to run, tracks comprising of multiple iron rails need to be laid and these usually stretch for thousands of miles in all directions in order to meet the basic purpose of a train, namely to connect far-flung cities. This also explains as to why train tracks are laid outside city limits – it is because a train is meant to travel beyond the city to other destinations. In comparison, a tram runs on tracks which are laid within the city alongside roads and pathways and connects various points that are included in its urban locale. Therefore, as opposed to the intercity nature of the train, a tram is an intracity mode.

Another difference between the tracks for trams and trains is that while those of the former are at level with the general level of the road or path along which it is laid, those meant for the latter are laid at a certain height above the ground. This is because tram tracks can be easily used by other modes of transport once the tram has crossed the area but train tracks need to be free from disturbances and are exclusively meant for trains only.

Because they run within city limits, distances covered by trams are shorter as compared to trains as is the length in terms of the number of bogies. Cities with a significant tram transport network include Melbourne and Vienna. While it is difficult to spot a tram with more than two bogies, it is common for trains to comprise of several bogies. Length might also be an outcome of the kind of usage – trams are meant only for local commuters while trains are used for transporting goods as also long-distance travellers.

So which one do you prefer, tram or train?

[addtoany]